Research

Behavioral Decision Theory 

Game Theory and Social and Economic Networks

Experimental and Empirical Works

Submitted

Abstract: The sudden onset, rapid spread, and later surges of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in shortages of ventilators, pharmaceuticals, and other critical resources, leaving individual clinicians to make rationing decisions for which they had little expertise or training. In experiments with laypeople (N=2007) and clinicians (N=1256) we document two inconsistencies in hypothetical rationing decisions: (1) The choice of which of two patients should receive a medical treatment can be systematically affected by adding a third patient who logically should not receive the treatment (an instance of the attraction effect); (2) Decisions as to which patient should receive the treatment are inconsistent with abstract rationing policies that participants themselves endorse. In the light of these observations, we argue that  predetermined policies administered by independent decision-makers are necessary to ensure fairness and consistency, as required by law and ethics, in healthcare rationing choices.

Research in Progress